在某些情况下,开曼公司的官方清算人可能能够采取行动追回公司破产前转移的资产。对于那些关注濒临破产的开曼公司事务的人来说,了解开曼群岛官方清算人和大法院所拥有的法定权力至关重要。
可撤销的优先权
《公司法(修订版)》(「该法」)规定,「在公司无法偿还第93 条所指的债务时,公司为了使该债权人优先于其他债权人而对任何债权人作出、招致、承担或遭受的任何财产转让或转移,或对财产的抵押,以及每项付款义务和司法程序,如果是在清算开始前六个月内作出、招致、承担或遭受的,经公司清算人申请,均可撤销。」
值得注意的是,如果在清算开始前六 (6) 个月内发生、产生、取得或遭受付款,则向开曼公司「关联方」支付的款项应被视为是为了给予债权人优先权而支付,因此,根据公司清算人的申请,该款项可予撤销。
如果债权人有能力控制开曼公司或在公司财务和经营决策方面施加重大影响,则该债权人应被视为「关联方」。
公司在什么情况下无法偿还债务?
若发生下列情况,开曼公司将被视为无力偿还债务:
(a) 未遵守法定要求;
在当前的经济条件下,在开曼群岛(“开曼”)或英属维尔京群岛(“BVI”)注册成立的离岸公司(包括作为投资基金开展业务的公司)的股东越来越多地被迫考虑,在董事对公司事务管理不善负有责任时,其对该等董事所享有的权利。尤其是,小股东特别希望了解是否有救济措施,使其能够克服“违法者控制”的局面。换言之,通常董事会的组成和管理是由大股东控制的。在本篇文章中,我们简要介绍了在开曼和BVI两个司法管辖区,董事所承担的职责以及股东可获得的救济措施。
董事职责的范围是什么?
开曼群岛
开曼公司董事的职责规定在普通法中,包括:(i)以公司的最佳利益善意行事的职责;(ii)为适当目的行使其权力的职责(而不得为未授权的目的行使其权力);以及(iii)不得牟取秘密利润的职责。
英属维尔京群岛
On 23 October 2024, Deputy High Court Judge Le Pichon of the Court of First Instance in the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR granted recognition and assistance to Chan Ho Yin (also known as Michael Chan) (“Mr Chan“) of Kroll (HK) Ltd and Elaine Hanrahan (“Ms Hanrahan“), the joint official liquidators of Bull’s-Eye Limited (“Bull’s-Eye”) following a letter of request issued by the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court.
With the rising popularity of alternative dispute resolution globally (including in insolvency related cases), it is important to take stock of where the Cayman Islands currently stands (as a leading jurisdiction in cross-border insolvency and restructuring) on the use of mediation in this context.
1.All eyes on redemption right
Redemption rights have increasingly been under the spotlight in the past year, as more and more investors contemplate an exit from under-performing investments.
As the redemption of shares involves a return of capital, it is prohibited under Cayman Islands law except to the extent permitted by statute. Section 37 of the Cayman Islands’ Companies Act (the Act) provides:
Key takeaways
Do you have any Cayman Islands entities that you are considering terminating prior to year-end?
In this briefing, Ogier Global's Corinne Cellier, associate director and head of our solvent liquidations team, reminds us of the options and timing for the termination of Cayman Islands entities. Our aim is to make the process as straightforward and clear as possible for our clients, navigating the applicable deadlines and regulatory considerations.
The Cayman Islands team obtained what may be the first instance of a permanent stay of an official liquidation of a Cayman Islands company.
Few would disagree that when a company is placed in official liquidation, that is the penultimate step before the company's death. Official liquidators will realise the company's assets and distribute them to stakeholders, before the company's eventual, but inevitable dissolution.
But does official liquidation have to be the end of the company? Can anything be done to halt the march towards dissolution?
In many of the recent insolvencies of digital asset companies, liquidators have been appointed over companies in which digital assets have been fraudulently transferred from wallets controlled by an insolvent company into other unidentified wallets in foreign jurisdictions.
The anonymity of cryptoassets causes serious difficulties for insolvency practitioners in identifying the third parties who received funds and the location of the digital wallets.
昨今、ケイマン諸島の判決で、債権者との間のスキーム・オブ・アレンジメントを取り扱ったRe In the Matter of E-House (China) Enterprise Holdings Limited [1]において、セガル裁判官が米国、英国、ヨーロッパにおける制裁措置がスキーム・オブ・アレンジメントにどのような潜在的な法的影響をもたらすか、また、当該スキームが国際的にどのような法的効果を有するのかを明確にする判断を示しました。
現在のマクロ経済環境およびグローバル市場の激動状況に照らせば、誠実な企業再建実施後も継続した企業の事業活動が可能となるような方策を模索することにつき、柔軟で積極的な役割を果たす意思が裁判所にあることを確認したものです。
なお、ケイマン諸島が企業再建における最先端の法域であることは、裁判官による会社債権者との調整案策定のために会社を代理するリストラクチャリング・オフィサーの選任にかかる第一号事例からも示されています。この事例については「ケイマン諸島における新たな企業再建の幕開け」をご参照ください。
背景およびスキーム・オブ・アレンジメントの提案